Delhi High Court Steps In as Accused Challenges NIA Proceedings

Red Fort blast case has seen a significant legal development as the Delhi High Court issued a notice to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) while hearing petitions filed by accused Jasir Bilal Wani, also known as Danish. The court has scheduled the next hearing for July 23, signaling continued judicial scrutiny in this high-profile case. Wani, one of the key accused in the November 2025 explosion near the Red Fort in Delhi, has challenged two major decisions. First, he opposed the extension of the investigation period beyond the standard 90 days granted by a special NIA court in February 2026. Second, he contested the rejection of his bail plea by the same court, which had earlier denied him relief at the Patiala House Court. Following that rejection, Wani approached the High Court seeking intervention. The case stems from a devastating car explosion on November 10, 2025, near the Red Fort, which claimed 15 lives and left several others seriously injured. According to investigators, the blast was carried out using a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device. Authorities identified Dr. Umar ur Nabi as the suspected suicide attacker involved in executing the explosion. During earlier proceedings, the special NIA court allowed the agency’s request to extend the investigation period, citing the complexity and seriousness of the case. The court, presided over by Principal District and Sessions Judge Pitambar Datt, permitted an additional 90 days for investigation. This extension was granted to allow a deeper probe into financial transactions, digital evidence, and possible terror networks linked to the accused. The NIA had invoked provisions under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), arguing that cases involving national security often require extended timelines for thorough investigation. The agency emphasized the need to examine digital footprints, funding sources, and wider conspiratorial links. In addition to Wani, several other accused—including Aamir Rashid Mir, Mufti Irfan Ahmad Wage, Dr. Mujamil Shakeel Ganie, Dr. Adil Ahmad Rather, Dr. Shaheen Saeed, and Shoaib—remain in judicial custody. The court extended their detention considering the gravity of the case. While Shoaib was physically presented in court, the remaining accused appeared via video conferencing due to security and logistical considerations. As the investigation continues, the High Court’s involvement highlights the ongoing legal battle surrounding procedural fairness and the balance between national security concerns and individual rights.